[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2fbb070-ad57-0015-45d0-2402368ba35e@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:55:36 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Shaun Tancheff <shaun@...cheff.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Fixup direct bi_rw modifiers
On 08/01/2016 09:17 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 08/01/2016 05:47 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 04:45:48PM -0500, Shaun Tancheff wrote:
>>> bi_rw should be using bio_set_op_attrs to set bi_rw.
>>
>> Looks fine,
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> Added, thanks Shaun.
>
>> Jens,
>>
>> what do you think about renaming bi_rw? There aren't too many users
>> left, and any old code that would keep using it is alsmost guranteed
>> to be broken, so sending a post-rc1 patch to rename it might make
>> everyone else life easier. Especially as it's also grossly misnamed
>> now.
>
> I was planning on doing that, after -rc1. Much better to get build
> breakage, than potentially much worse breakage.
Set of three patches, where the target one is an actual bug fix...
Temporary branch, I'll rebase it once -rc1 is out, if more
changes/fixups need to be made in the next week until that happens.
http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-4.8/bi_rwf
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists