linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Fix seccomp for UM (next)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1608011053430.15475@namei.org>
Date:	Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:54:06 +1000 (AEST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
cc:	Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Fix seccomp for UM (next)

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016, Kees Cook wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This series fix the recent seccomp update for the User-mode Linux architecture
> >> (32-bit and 64-bit) since commit 26703c636c1f3272b39bd0f6d04d2e970984f1b6
> >> (close the hole where ptrace can change a syscall out from under seccomp).
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Mickaël Salaün (3):
> >>   um/ptrace: Fix the syscall_trace_leave call
> >>   um/ptrace: Fix the syscall number update after a ptrace
> >>   seccomp: Remove 2-phase API documentation
> >>
> >>  arch/Kconfig                  | 11 -----------
> >>  arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c | 10 +++-------
> >>  arch/x86/um/ptrace_32.c       |  3 +++
> >>  arch/x86/um/ptrace_64.c       |  4 ++++
> >>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > Ah, perfect! Thanks for fixing this! James, can you pick this up for -next?
> >
> > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 
> James, can you take these fixes for v4.8? We'll need them for um to
> work correctly again. (They appear to still be missing from -next.)
> 

I'm pretty sure I don't have these patches, can you or the author send 
them to me?

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>