[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802121436.22123-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:14:36 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: jbaron@...mai.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, m.chehab@...sung.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
baolex.ni@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
vkuznets@...hat.com, pmladek@...e.com, tj@...nel.org,
jpoimboe@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 1080/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
lib/dynamic_debug.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
index fe42b6e..853158e 100644
--- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
+++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct ddebug_iter {
static DEFINE_MUTEX(ddebug_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(ddebug_tables);
static int verbose;
-module_param(verbose, int, 0644);
+module_param(verbose, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
/* Return the path relative to source root */
static inline const char *trim_prefix(const char *path)
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists