[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFweZz24asnG=OieC+ZNF-7zaZPrFKKuBJpLhNyioQdxKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:40:34 -0400
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for v4.8
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> So PSR seems more likely. The underruns might point at some watermark
> fail though :(
>
> I have a couple of pending PSR patches you may want to try as well,
> if i915.enable_psr=0 helps.
>
> First set is here:
> git://github.com/vsyrjala/linux.git psr_setup_time_2
> This should be perfectly safe to go in actually, as it will only result
> in disabling PSR with certain panels.
This first git pull fixes it for me, as far as I can tell. I'm not
sure that the problem is 100% reproducible, but I booted into each
kernel twice, and the current git tree is broken, while with your
psr_setup_time_2 branch pulled it works. So it does seem to be the
fix.
> The second set is here:
> git://github.com/vsyrjala/linux.git psr_fixes_2
I didn't even test that one.
Should I just pull that psr_setup_time2 branch for real? I'd like to
get a real pull request with explanations etc, but other than that it
looks good to go.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists