[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802112408.19113-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:24:08 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, david@...deman.nu,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com, max@...mpel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0557/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/tuners/mt2266.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/tuners/mt2266.c b/drivers/media/tuners/mt2266.c
index bca4d75..04e7712 100644
--- a/drivers/media/tuners/mt2266.c
+++ b/drivers/media/tuners/mt2266.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct mt2266_priv {
/* Here, frequencies are expressed in kiloHertz to avoid 32 bits overflows */
static int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Turn on/off debugging (default:off).");
#define dprintk(args...) do { if (debug) {printk(KERN_DEBUG "MT2266: " args); printk("\n"); }} while (0)
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists