[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802110955.9747-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:09:55 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, a.hajda@...sung.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, hans.verkuil@...co.com,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0419/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/i2c/s5k4ecgx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/s5k4ecgx.c b/drivers/media/i2c/s5k4ecgx.c
index 8a0f22d..7b06dae 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/s5k4ecgx.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/s5k4ecgx.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
#include <media/v4l2-subdev.h>
static int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
#define S5K4ECGX_DRIVER_NAME "s5k4ecgx"
#define S5K4ECGX_FIRMWARE "s5k4ecgx.bin"
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists