[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802103601.16039-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:36:01 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0034/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index def97b3..ce4f512 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
#ifdef MMU_DEBUG
static bool dbg = 0;
-module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
+module_param(dbg, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
#define pgprintk(x...) do { if (dbg) printk(x); } while (0)
#define rmap_printk(x...) do { if (dbg) printk(x); } while (0)
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists