[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802103803.18024-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:38:03 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, tj@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com, travis@....com
Subject: [PATCH 0064/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/ata/pata_octeon_cf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_octeon_cf.c b/drivers/ata/pata_octeon_cf.c
index 2724595..d0d002c 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_octeon_cf.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_octeon_cf.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template octeon_cf_sht = {
};
static int enable_dma;
-module_param(enable_dma, int, 0444);
+module_param(enable_dma, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_dma,
"Enable use of DMA on interfaces that support it (0=no dma [default], 1=use dma)");
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists