[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802111802.15080-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:18:02 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, awalls@...metrocast.net,
a.hajda@...sung.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com,
nenggun.kim@...sung.com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: [PATCH 0497/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/saa7134/saa7134-i2c.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/saa7134/saa7134-i2c.c b/drivers/media/pci/saa7134/saa7134-i2c.c
index 8ef6399..2c74b2f 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/saa7134/saa7134-i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/saa7134/saa7134-i2c.c
@@ -34,11 +34,11 @@
/* ----------------------------------------------------------- */
static unsigned int i2c_debug;
-module_param(i2c_debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(i2c_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(i2c_debug,"enable debug messages [i2c]");
static unsigned int i2c_scan;
-module_param(i2c_scan, int, 0444);
+module_param(i2c_scan, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(i2c_scan,"scan i2c bus at insmod time");
#define i2c_dbg(level, fmt, arg...) do { \
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists