[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802111320.12013-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:13:20 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, hans.verkuil@...co.com,
a.hajda@...sung.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com,
elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 0452/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/cobalt/cobalt-driver.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cobalt/cobalt-driver.c b/drivers/media/pci/cobalt/cobalt-driver.c
index 8d6f04f..4a6acae 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/cobalt/cobalt-driver.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/cobalt/cobalt-driver.c
@@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, cobalt_pci_tbl);
static atomic_t cobalt_instance = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
int cobalt_debug;
-module_param_named(debug, cobalt_debug, int, 0644);
+module_param_named(debug, cobalt_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level. Default: 0\n");
int cobalt_ignore_err;
-module_param_named(ignore_err, cobalt_ignore_err, int, 0644);
+module_param_named(ignore_err, cobalt_ignore_err, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_err,
"If set then ignore missing i2c adapters/receivers. Default: 0\n");
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists