[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <wrfjinvjfi9d.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 08:49:18 -0400
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
To: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0955/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com> writes:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the
> corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Excuse me, but why are you CC'ing everybody and their 217 cousins on
these patches?
The fact that someone had a patch applied in a directory close to this
file within the last 3 years is not justification for spamming them with
this.
Jes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists