lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:11:22 +0800 From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com> To: shaggy@...nel.org, jack@...e.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com, tomi.valkeinen@...com, m.chehab@...sung.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com Cc: jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com, mhalcrow@...gle.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, oneukum@...e.com Subject: [PATCH 1045/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com> --- fs/jfs/super.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/jfs/super.c b/fs/jfs/super.c index cec8814..c348410 100644 --- a/fs/jfs/super.c +++ b/fs/jfs/super.c @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ struct task_struct *jfsSyncThread; #ifdef CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG int jfsloglevel = JFS_LOGLEVEL_WARN; -module_param(jfsloglevel, int, 0644); +module_param(jfsloglevel, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(jfsloglevel, "Specify JFS loglevel (0, 1 or 2)"); #endif -- 2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists