linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC, sb_edac: Fix channel reporting on Knights Landing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:06:56 +0000
From:	"Chrzaniuk, Hubert" <hubert.chrzaniuk@...el.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"Odzioba, Lukasz" <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dougthompson@...ssion.com" <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC, sb_edac: Fix channel reporting on Knights
 Landing

From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:bp@...en8.de] 
> What is that SOB supposed to mean?

The original patch has been prepared by Lukas, then I [Hubert] rebased it, added commentary and cleaned up the code.
In the end, Lukas modified it a bit once again according to suggestions from Tony. My SOB is unnecessary here, it only makes it more confusing.

Hubert