linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC, sb_edac: Fix channel reporting on Knights Landing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160803071228.GC31099@nazgul.tnic>
Date:	Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:12:28 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"Chrzaniuk, Hubert" <hubert.chrzaniuk@...el.com>
Cc:	"Odzioba, Lukasz" <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dougthompson@...ssion.com" <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC, sb_edac: Fix channel reporting on Knights
 Landing

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:06:56AM +0000, Chrzaniuk, Hubert wrote:
> The original patch has been prepared by Lukas, then I [Hubert] rebased
> it, added commentary and cleaned up the code. In the end, Lukas
> modified it a bit once again according to suggestions from Tony. My
> SOB is unnecessary here, it only makes it more confusing.

So aspects like that can (and should!) be documented in the commit
message in free text, before the SOB chain. Something like this, for
example:

"...

Hubert:
 - rebased to 4.8
 - comments and code cleanup
"

You can send me just the exact free text you want in there as a reply to
this message and I'll integrate it.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--