[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <570CC49A75F8F64D9F711A9B9476C48C1FC2865E@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:44:22 +0000
From: "Chrzaniuk, Hubert" <hubert.chrzaniuk@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "Odzioba, Lukasz" <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"dougthompson@...ssion.com" <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC, sb_edac: Fix channel reporting on Knights
Landing
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:06:56AM +0000, Chrzaniuk, Hubert wrote:
>> The original patch has been prepared by Lukas, then I [Hubert] rebased
>> it, added commentary and cleaned up the code. In the end, Lukas
>> modified it a bit once again according to suggestions from Tony. My
>> SOB is unnecessary here, it only makes it more confusing.
> So aspects like that can (and should!) be documented in the commit message in free text, before the SOB chain. Something like this, for
> example:
> "...
> Hubert:
> - rebased to 4.8
> - comments and code cleanup
> "
> You can send me just the exact free text you want in there as a reply to this message and I'll integrate it.
What you have suggested is simple and perfect, let’s leave it this way :)
Hubert:
- rebased to 4.8
- comments and code cleanup
Thanks a lot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists