linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] power: add power sequence library

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:04:57 +0800
From:	Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
To:	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:	Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	stern@...land.harvard.edu, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
	broonie@...nel.org, sre@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	shawnguo@...nel.org, dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw3@...radead.org,
	k.kozlowski@...sung.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	p.zabel@...gutronix.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
	mail@...iej.szmigiero.name, troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com,
	festevam@...il.com, oscar@...andei.net, stephen.boyd@...aro.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, stillcompiling@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] power: add power sequence library

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:16:58PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> El Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:30:48AM +0800 Peter Chen ha dit:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/power/pwrseq/core.c b/drivers/power/pwrseq/core.c
> >
> > ...
> >
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(pwrseq_list_mutex);
> > +static LIST_HEAD(pwrseq_list);
> > +
> > +int pwrseq_get(struct device_node *np, struct pwrseq *p)
> > +{
> > +	if (p && p->get)
> > +		return p->get(np, p);
> > +
> > +	return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int pwrseq_on(struct device_node *np, struct pwrseq *p)
> > +{
> > +	if (p && p->on)
> > +		return p->on(np, p);
> > +
> > +	return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void pwrseq_off(struct pwrseq *p)
> > +{
> > +	if (p && p->off)
> > +		p->off(p);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void pwrseq_put(struct pwrseq *p)
> > +{
> > +	if (p && p->put)
> > +		p->put(p);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void pwrseq_free(struct pwrseq *p)
> > +{
> > +	if (p && p->free)
> > +		p->free(p);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void pwrseq_register(struct pwrseq *pwrseq)
> > +{
> > +	mutex_lock(&pwrseq_list_mutex);
> > +	list_add(&pwrseq->node, &pwrseq_list);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&pwrseq_list_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void pwrseq_unregister(struct pwrseq *pwrseq)
> > +{
> > +	mutex_lock(&pwrseq_list_mutex);
> > +	list_del(&pwrseq->node);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&pwrseq_list_mutex);
> > +}
> 
> What is the purpose of pwrseq_register/unregister()? The pwrseq
> structs are added and removed from pwrseq_list, but besides that
> pwrseq_list is not used.
> 

I had thought we may need to dump the pwrseq list in future for debug
purpose. I will delete this unnecessary code.

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen