[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160804150038.GQ6862@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:00:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf/core: introduce pmu_event_flags and
PMUEF_READ_CPU_PKG
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 07:44:54PM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
> Introduce the flag PMUEF_READ_CPU_PKG, useful for uncore events, that
> allows a PMU to signal the generic perf code that an event is readable
> on the current CPU if the event is:
> - active in a CPU in the same package as the current CPU (local CPU)
Ok that I get..
> - not active but is attached to a CPU (i.e. event->cpu != -1) in the
> same package as the current CPU.
but this, not so much. Why would you want to read an inactive counter?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists