[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160806183549.GB3423@pc>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:35:49 +0100
From: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
To: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
mhocko@...e.com, vdavydov@...tuozzo.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] fs: befs: remove in vain variable assignment
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:24:34PM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> On 31/07/16 21:34, Salah Triki wrote:
> > There is no need to set *value, it will be overwritten later.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
> > ---
> > fs/befs/btree.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/befs/btree.c b/fs/befs/btree.c
> > index a0e8cfa..f33fc6c 100644
> > --- a/fs/befs/btree.c
> > +++ b/fs/befs/btree.c
> > @@ -348,8 +348,6 @@ befs_find_key(struct super_block *sb, struct befs_btree_node *node,
> >
> > befs_debug(sb, "---> %s %s", __func__, findkey);
> >
> > - *value = 0;
> > -
> > findkey_len = strlen(findkey);
> >
> > /* if node can not contain key, just skeep this node */
> >
>
> Hi Salah,
>
> The key here is that befs_btree_find(), the only consumer of befs_find_key(),
> doesn't use the value if the return is BEFS_BT_NOT_FOUND.
>
> Tested the patch anyway to be sure.
>
> Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
>
> Pushed to the befs-next branch:
> https://github.com/luisbg/linux-befs/tree/befs-next
>
> Thanks!
> Luis
Thanx :)
Salah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists