linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] platform-drivers-x86 for 4.8-2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFz_Z9=gcferSXvBZe6Di98dLe_3SwjRpwomQ848Q1yMag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Aug 2016 23:23:09 -0400
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] platform-drivers-x86 for 4.8-2

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Minor platform specific event handling updates and a Kconfig cleanup.

No. You already sent a *different* copy of all of these except for the
dell-wmi one in a previous pull requests.

This pull request gets me four new commits, but three of them I
already had. From you.

See for example your new commit

  2dd73625dedc platform/x86: Drop duplicate dependencies on X86

vs

  25789f95a883 platform/x86: Drop duplicate dependencies on X86

which are identical patches, just different dates.

Why should I pull a branch that is this confused?

It's not like I got those patches from somebody else, and there was
just a mis-communication about who should apply them. They were both
from *you*. That old commit came in in 4.7-rc4, so it's not even all
that recent.

              Linus