[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 10:14:48 -0700
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: zhongjiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix the incorrect hugepages count
On 08/07/2016 07:49 PM, zhongjiang wrote:
> From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
>
> when memory hotplug enable, free hugepages will be freed if movable node offline.
> therefore, /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages will be incorrect.
>
> The patch fix it by reduce the max_huge_pages when the node offline.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index f904246..3356e3a 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1448,6 +1448,7 @@ static void dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
> list_del(&page->lru);
> h->free_huge_pages--;
> h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
> + h->max_huge_pages--;
> update_and_free_page(h, page);
> }
> spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>
Adding Naoya as he was the original author of this code.
>From quick look it appears that the huge page will be migrated (allocated
on another node). If my understanding is correct, then max_huge_pages
should not be adjusted here.
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists