lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160809065600.GA3763@nazgul.tnic>
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2016 08:56:00 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	york sun <york.sun@....com>
Cc:	"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	"morbidrsa@...il.com" <morbidrsa@...il.com>,
	"oss@...error.net" <oss@...error.net>,
	Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 03/11] driver/edac/mpc85xx_edac: Drop setting/clearing
 RFXE bit in HID1

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:06:39AM +0000, york sun wrote:
> It is uncorrectable. DDR controller can only report the error. I don't 
> believe EDAC driver can do more. For the same reason I said we can leave 
> RXFE as is, even for e500v1 case (with RIO or PCI is enabled). Nothing 
> can be done with uncorrectable error.

Of course it can: it can panic the machine so that it doesn't corrupt
data on secondary storage. You might consider whether this is a better
course of action instead of only reporting the error.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ