linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211/wlcore: Add ieee80211_hw variable to get_expected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1470729510.28531.13.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Tue, 09 Aug 2016 09:58:30 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	"Altshul, Maxim" <maxim.altshul@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	"john.stultz@...aro.org" <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
	Eliad Peller <eliad@...ery.com>,
	"Machani, Yaniv" <yanivma@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211/wlcore: Add ieee80211_hw variable to
 get_expected_throughput

On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 10:42 +0000, Altshul, Maxim wrote:
> Yes, exactly! Should I send the patch then so that we protect
> get_expected_throughput?

Yes please.

> If so, then please have a look at my previous mesh patch (not yet
> applied) "[PATCH v3] mac80211: mesh: Add support for HW RC
> implementation".

Looks ok, I just haven't applied it because net-next was closed until
today :)

> If you approve the mesh patch, then I will send two patches:
> 1. Check for sta->uploaded in the drv wrapper (will change the drv
> wrapper header to get sta_info)
> 2. v4 for the mesh patch with respect to header change in patch 1.

I don't think adding the check changes anything wrt. the mesh patch?

johannes