[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F52F6CF13382174692D81838F3DBEF41136F0B13@DFRE01.ent.ti.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:03:53 +0000
From: "Altshul, Maxim" <maxim.altshul@...com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "john.stultz@...aro.org" <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Eliad Peller <eliad@...ery.com>,
"Machani, Yaniv" <yanivma@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211/wlcore: Add ieee80211_hw variable to
get_expected_throughput
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:58:30, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211/wlcore: Add ieee80211_hw variable to
> get_expected_throughput
> >
> > If you approve the mesh patch, then I will send two patches:
> > 1. Check for sta->uploaded in the drv wrapper (will change the drv
> > wrapper header to get sta_info) 2. v4 for the mesh patch with
> > respect to header change in patch 1.
>
> I don't think adding the check changes anything wrt. the mesh patch?
>
I thought about changing the header of drv_get_expected_throughput to receive sta_info *sta so that I can get sta->uploaded from that.
I could use get container of &sta->sta to get sta->uploaded, but I think it's better to get the pointer directly?
Max
Powered by blists - more mailing lists