linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] w1: fix timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1871470783285@web30h.yandex.ru>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 01:54:45 +0300
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To:	Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: fix timeout_us parameter description

Hi

08.08.2016, 16:52, "Wei Yongjun" <weiyj.lk@...il.com>:
> Fix 'timeout_us' parameter description.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/w1/w1.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1.c b/drivers/w1/w1.c
> index bb34362..e213c67 100644
> --- a/drivers/w1/w1.c
> +++ b/drivers/w1/w1.c
> @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ int w1_max_slave_ttl = 10;
>  module_param_named(timeout, w1_timeout, int, 0);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(timeout, "time in seconds between automatic slave searches");
>  module_param_named(timeout_us, w1_timeout_us, int, 0);
> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(timeout, "time in microseconds between automatic slave"
> - " searches");
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(timeout_us,
> + "time in microseconds between automatic slave searches");

I believe there will be no harm to put it to on one line, even if it crosses some obscure very-long-line rule