[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee76ece2-5852-4f22-9b99-1a6842bd6ee5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:22:22 +0800
From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: fix timeout_us parameter description
Hi
On 08/10/2016 06:54 AM, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi
>
> 08.08.2016, 16:52, "Wei Yongjun" <weiyj.lk@...il.com>:
>> Fix 'timeout_us' parameter description.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/w1/w1.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1.c b/drivers/w1/w1.c
>> index bb34362..e213c67 100644
>> --- a/drivers/w1/w1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/w1/w1.c
>> @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ int w1_max_slave_ttl = 10;
>> module_param_named(timeout, w1_timeout, int, 0);
>> MODULE_PARM_DESC(timeout, "time in seconds between automatic slave searches");
>> module_param_named(timeout_us, w1_timeout_us, int, 0);
>> -MODULE_PARM_DESC(timeout, "time in microseconds between automatic slave"
>> - " searches");
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(timeout_us,
>> + "time in microseconds between automatic slave searches");
> I believe there will be no harm to put it to on one line, even if it crosses some obscure very-long-line rule
Maybe the bad patch description confused you, this patch the typo in the
first argument of MODULE_PARM_DESC(), use timeout_us instead of timeout.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists