linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] arm, dts: add TC2 cpu capacity-dmips-mhz information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <08d9e2ff-3c66-5129-1c82-df314e2204db@arm.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:52:08 +0100
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	mark.rutland@....com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
	will.deacon@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] arm, dts: add TC2 cpu capacity-dmips-mhz
 information



On 10/08/16 16:43, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/08/16 16:33, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Juri,
>>
>> On 19/07/16 13:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>> Add TC2 cpu capacity binding information.
>>>
>>
>> If you repost it,
>>
>> s/binding//
>>
>
> Yes, I think I'll need to repost, squashing the arm64 fix in the
> appropriate patch. Thanks.
>
>>> Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
>>> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>
> Thanks!
>
>> (assuming you take it via some other tree, let us know if it's
>>  OK to merge the DTS separately and you want us to pick them)
>>
>
> As per off-line discussion with Russell, binding doc and arm bits should
> go via his patch system. While arm64 bits could go separately via aarch64.
>
> Does this make sense?

Yes, we can pick up the juno and tc2 dts changes and send it via
arm-soc. I have already acked them, so you can take it via other tree if
required.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep