[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160810154324.GJ3540@e106622-lin>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:43:24 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] arm, dts: add TC2 cpu capacity-dmips-mhz
information
Hi,
On 10/08/16 16:33, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Juri,
>
> On 19/07/16 13:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >Add TC2 cpu capacity binding information.
> >
>
> If you repost it,
>
> s/binding//
>
Yes, I think I'll need to repost, squashing the arm64 fix in the
appropriate patch. Thanks.
> >Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
> >Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Thanks!
> (assuming you take it via some other tree, let us know if it's
> OK to merge the DTS separately and you want us to pick them)
>
As per off-line discussion with Russell, binding doc and arm bits should
go via his patch system. While arm64 bits could go separately via aarch64.
Does this make sense?
Best,
- Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists