[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57AA8D9B.7010102@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:12:43 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>,
"Tianhong Ding" <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/14] arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block
On 2016/8/8 17:18, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Use the same tactic to cpu and numa-distance nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> index c7fe3ec..2601660 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
> + pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
I think this check should be added to of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(), which before
the numa_add_memblk() called, it's the same logic in of_numa_parse_cpu_nodes() and
the node id is checked before calling numa_add_memblk() in ACPI.
Thanks
Hanjun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists