[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57AAA29B.9060608@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:42:19 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>,
"Tianhong Ding" <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/14] arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block
On 2016/8/10 10:12, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2016/8/8 17:18, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> Use the same tactic to cpu and numa-distance nodes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> index c7fe3ec..2601660 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
>> {
>> int ret;
>>
>> + if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
>> + pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> I think this check should be added to of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(), which before
> the numa_add_memblk() called, it's the same logic in of_numa_parse_cpu_nodes() and
> the node id is checked before calling numa_add_memblk() in ACPI.
Yes, you are right. This check is arch independent.
>
> Thanks
> Hanjun
>
>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists