[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2118361.tr3K3hSZxF@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:57:57 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: cpuidle: declare cpuidle_ops __read_mostly
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:49:57 PM CEST Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> index 7dccc96..762e0929 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ extern struct of_cpuidle_method __cpuidle_method_of_table[];
> static const struct of_cpuidle_method __cpuidle_method_of_table_sentinel
> __used __section(__cpuidle_method_of_table_end);
>
> -static struct cpuidle_ops cpuidle_ops[NR_CPUS];
> +static struct cpuidle_ops cpuidle_ops[NR_CPUS] __read_mostly;
Should this perhaps be percpu data instead?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists