lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:19:26 +0800
From:	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: cpuidle: declare cpuidle_ops __read_mostly

Dear Arnd,

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:57:57 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:49:57 PM CEST Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> > index 7dccc96..762e0929 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ extern struct of_cpuidle_method __cpuidle_method_of_table[];
> >  static const struct of_cpuidle_method __cpuidle_method_of_table_sentinel
> >         __used __section(__cpuidle_method_of_table_end);
> >  
> > -static struct cpuidle_ops cpuidle_ops[NR_CPUS];
> > +static struct cpuidle_ops cpuidle_ops[NR_CPUS] __read_mostly;  
> 
> Should this perhaps be percpu data instead?
> 

Per my understanding, percpu is used for those vars with normal read/write
frequency, while the cpuidle_ops is read mostly, so IMHO, __read_mostly
is suitable, what do you think?

Thanks,
Jisheng

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ