linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] genirq: Machine-parsable version of /proc/interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEfhGiwVDSPOGVXN6ur_AG4in9KRXpPppBEL-4bxYu2vsUxN9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:26:23 -0400
From:	Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	David Decotigny <decot@...gle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] genirq: Machine-parsable version of /proc/interrupts

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
>
> Add struct kobject to struct irq_desc to allow for easy export
> to sysfs.  This allows for much simpler userspace-parsing of
> the information contained in struct irq_desc.
>
> Note that sysfs is not available at the time of early irq initialization.
> These interrupts are accounted for using a postcore_initcall callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
Bump... Thomas, are you still the maintainer for irq/core?

Thanks,
Craig