linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] genirq: Machine-parsable version of /proc/interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609021552070.5647@nanos>
Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:52:38 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com>
cc:     David Decotigny <decot@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] genirq: Machine-parsable version of
 /proc/interrupts

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Craig Gallek wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com> wrote:
> > From: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
> >
> > Add struct kobject to struct irq_desc to allow for easy export
> > to sysfs.  This allows for much simpler userspace-parsing of
> > the information contained in struct irq_desc.
> >
> > Note that sysfs is not available at the time of early irq initialization.
> > These interrupts are accounted for using a postcore_initcall callback.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
> Bump... Thomas, are you still the maintainer for irq/core?

Yup and I'm looking at it right now. Sorry for the delay.