lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201608110348.S1i8J408%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 04:01:30 +0800
From:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:	Jason Low <jason.low2@....com>
Cc:	kbuild-all@...org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, imre.deak@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@....com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, terry.rudd@....com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/mutex: Prevent lock starvation when spinning
 is enabled

Hi Jason,

[auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc1 next-20160809]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jason-Low/locking-mutex-Prevent-lock-starvation-when-spinning-is-enabled/20160811-034327
config: x86_64-randconfig-x013-201632 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function 'do_yield_to_waiter':
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:441:10: error: 'struct mutex' has no member named 'yield_to_waiter'
     if (lock->yield_to_waiter != true)
             ^~
   kernel/locking/mutex.c:442:7: error: 'struct mutex' has no member named 'yield_to_waiter'
      lock->yield_to_waiter = true;
          ^~
   kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function 'clear_yield_to_waiter':
   kernel/locking/mutex.c:447:6: error: 'struct mutex' has no member named 'yield_to_waiter'
     lock->yield_to_waiter = false;
         ^~
   kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function 'need_yield_to_waiter':
   kernel/locking/mutex.c:452:13: error: 'struct mutex' has no member named 'yield_to_waiter'
     return lock->yield_to_waiter;
                ^~
   kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function '__mutex_lock_common':
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:607:3: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
      if ((!need_yield_to_waiter(lock) || wakeups > 1) &&
      ^~
   kernel/locking/mutex.c:613:4: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the 'if'
       break;
       ^~~~~
   kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function 'need_yield_to_waiter':
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:453:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
    }
    ^

vim +441 kernel/locking/mutex.c

   435	{
   436		*wakeups += 1;
   437	
   438		if (*wakeups < MUTEX_WAKEUP_THRESHOLD)
   439			return;
   440	
 > 441		if (lock->yield_to_waiter != true)
   442			lock->yield_to_waiter = true;
   443	}
   444	
   445	static inline void clear_yield_to_waiter(struct mutex *lock)
   446	{
 > 447		lock->yield_to_waiter = false;
   448	}
   449	
   450	static inline bool need_yield_to_waiter(struct mutex *lock)
   451	{
   452		return lock->yield_to_waiter;
 > 453	}
   454	#endif
   455	
   456	__visible __used noinline
   457	void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count);
   458	
   459	/**
   460	 * mutex_unlock - release the mutex
   461	 * @lock: the mutex to be released
   462	 *
   463	 * Unlock a mutex that has been locked by this task previously.
   464	 *
   465	 * This function must not be used in interrupt context. Unlocking
   466	 * of a not locked mutex is not allowed.
   467	 *
   468	 * This function is similar to (but not equivalent to) up().
   469	 */
   470	void __sched mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock)
   471	{
   472		/*
   473		 * The unlocking fastpath is the 0->1 transition from 'locked'
   474		 * into 'unlocked' state:
   475		 */
   476	#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
   477		/*
   478		 * When debugging is enabled we must not clear the owner before time,
   479		 * the slow path will always be taken, and that clears the owner field
   480		 * after verifying that it was indeed current.
   481		 */
   482		mutex_clear_owner(lock);
   483	#endif
   484		__mutex_fastpath_unlock(&lock->count, __mutex_unlock_slowpath);
   485	}
   486	
   487	EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_unlock);
   488	
   489	/**
   490	 * ww_mutex_unlock - release the w/w mutex
   491	 * @lock: the mutex to be released
   492	 *
   493	 * Unlock a mutex that has been locked by this task previously with any of the
   494	 * ww_mutex_lock* functions (with or without an acquire context). It is
   495	 * forbidden to release the locks after releasing the acquire context.
   496	 *
   497	 * This function must not be used in interrupt context. Unlocking
   498	 * of a unlocked mutex is not allowed.
   499	 */
   500	void __sched ww_mutex_unlock(struct ww_mutex *lock)
   501	{
   502		/*
   503		 * The unlocking fastpath is the 0->1 transition from 'locked'
   504		 * into 'unlocked' state:
   505		 */
   506		if (lock->ctx) {
   507	#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
   508			DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lock->ctx->acquired);
   509	#endif
   510			if (lock->ctx->acquired > 0)
   511				lock->ctx->acquired--;
   512			lock->ctx = NULL;
   513		}
   514	
   515	#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
   516		/*
   517		 * When debugging is enabled we must not clear the owner before time,
   518		 * the slow path will always be taken, and that clears the owner field
   519		 * after verifying that it was indeed current.
   520		 */
   521		mutex_clear_owner(&lock->base);
   522	#endif
   523		__mutex_fastpath_unlock(&lock->base.count, __mutex_unlock_slowpath);
   524	}
   525	EXPORT_SYMBOL(ww_mutex_unlock);
   526	
   527	static inline int __sched
   528	__ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
   529	{
   530		struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
   531		struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx = READ_ONCE(ww->ctx);
   532	
   533		if (!hold_ctx)
   534			return 0;
   535	
   536		if (ctx->stamp - hold_ctx->stamp <= LONG_MAX &&
   537		    (ctx->stamp != hold_ctx->stamp || ctx > hold_ctx)) {
   538	#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
   539			DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ctx->contending_lock);
   540			ctx->contending_lock = ww;
   541	#endif
   542			return -EDEADLK;
   543		}
   544	
   545		return 0;
   546	}
   547	
   548	/*
   549	 * Lock a mutex (possibly interruptible), slowpath:
   550	 */
   551	static __always_inline int __sched
   552	__mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
   553			    struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip,
   554			    struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, const bool use_ww_ctx)
   555	{
   556		struct task_struct *task = current;
   557		struct mutex_waiter waiter;
   558		unsigned long flags;
   559		int ret;
   560		int wakeups = 0;
   561	
   562		if (use_ww_ctx) {
   563			struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
   564			if (unlikely(ww_ctx == READ_ONCE(ww->ctx)))
   565				return -EALREADY;
   566		}
   567	
   568		preempt_disable();
   569		mutex_acquire_nest(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, nest_lock, ip);
   570	
   571		if (mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx)) {
   572			/* got the lock, yay! */
   573			preempt_enable();
   574			return 0;
   575		}
   576	
   577		spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
   578	
   579		/*
   580		 * Once more, try to acquire the lock. Only try-lock the mutex if
   581		 * it is unlocked to reduce unnecessary xchg() operations.
   582		 */
   583		if (!need_yield_to_waiter(lock) && !mutex_is_locked(lock) &&
   584		    (atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, 0) == 1))
   585			goto skip_wait;
   586	
   587		debug_mutex_lock_common(lock, &waiter);
   588		debug_mutex_add_waiter(lock, &waiter, task);
   589	
   590		/* add waiting tasks to the end of the waitqueue (FIFO): */
   591		list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &lock->wait_list);
   592		waiter.task = task;
   593	
   594		lock_contended(&lock->dep_map, ip);
   595	
   596		for (;;) {
   597			/*
   598			 * Lets try to take the lock again - this is needed even if
   599			 * we get here for the first time (shortly after failing to
   600			 * acquire the lock), to make sure that we get a wakeup once
   601			 * it's unlocked. Later on, if we sleep, this is the
   602			 * operation that gives us the lock. We xchg it to -1, so
   603			 * that when we release the lock, we properly wake up the
   604			 * other waiters. We only attempt the xchg if the count is
   605			 * non-negative in order to avoid unnecessary xchg operations:
   606			 */
 > 607			if ((!need_yield_to_waiter(lock) || wakeups > 1) &&
   608			    atomic_read(&lock->count) >= 0 &&
   609			    (atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, -1) == 1))
   610				if (wakeups > 1)

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/octet-stream" (25495 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ