[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201608110348.S1i8J408%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 04:01:30 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@....com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, imre.deak@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@....com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, terry.rudd@....com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/mutex: Prevent lock starvation when spinning
is enabled
Hi Jason,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc1 next-20160809]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jason-Low/locking-mutex-Prevent-lock-starvation-when-spinning-is-enabled/20160811-034327
config: x86_64-randconfig-x013-201632 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function 'do_yield_to_waiter':
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:441:10: error: 'struct mutex' has no member named 'yield_to_waiter'
if (lock->yield_to_waiter != true)
^~
kernel/locking/mutex.c:442:7: error: 'struct mutex' has no member named 'yield_to_waiter'
lock->yield_to_waiter = true;
^~
kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function 'clear_yield_to_waiter':
kernel/locking/mutex.c:447:6: error: 'struct mutex' has no member named 'yield_to_waiter'
lock->yield_to_waiter = false;
^~
kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function 'need_yield_to_waiter':
kernel/locking/mutex.c:452:13: error: 'struct mutex' has no member named 'yield_to_waiter'
return lock->yield_to_waiter;
^~
kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function '__mutex_lock_common':
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:607:3: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
if ((!need_yield_to_waiter(lock) || wakeups > 1) &&
^~
kernel/locking/mutex.c:613:4: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the 'if'
break;
^~~~~
kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function 'need_yield_to_waiter':
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:453:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}
^
vim +441 kernel/locking/mutex.c
435 {
436 *wakeups += 1;
437
438 if (*wakeups < MUTEX_WAKEUP_THRESHOLD)
439 return;
440
> 441 if (lock->yield_to_waiter != true)
442 lock->yield_to_waiter = true;
443 }
444
445 static inline void clear_yield_to_waiter(struct mutex *lock)
446 {
> 447 lock->yield_to_waiter = false;
448 }
449
450 static inline bool need_yield_to_waiter(struct mutex *lock)
451 {
452 return lock->yield_to_waiter;
> 453 }
454 #endif
455
456 __visible __used noinline
457 void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count);
458
459 /**
460 * mutex_unlock - release the mutex
461 * @lock: the mutex to be released
462 *
463 * Unlock a mutex that has been locked by this task previously.
464 *
465 * This function must not be used in interrupt context. Unlocking
466 * of a not locked mutex is not allowed.
467 *
468 * This function is similar to (but not equivalent to) up().
469 */
470 void __sched mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock)
471 {
472 /*
473 * The unlocking fastpath is the 0->1 transition from 'locked'
474 * into 'unlocked' state:
475 */
476 #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
477 /*
478 * When debugging is enabled we must not clear the owner before time,
479 * the slow path will always be taken, and that clears the owner field
480 * after verifying that it was indeed current.
481 */
482 mutex_clear_owner(lock);
483 #endif
484 __mutex_fastpath_unlock(&lock->count, __mutex_unlock_slowpath);
485 }
486
487 EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_unlock);
488
489 /**
490 * ww_mutex_unlock - release the w/w mutex
491 * @lock: the mutex to be released
492 *
493 * Unlock a mutex that has been locked by this task previously with any of the
494 * ww_mutex_lock* functions (with or without an acquire context). It is
495 * forbidden to release the locks after releasing the acquire context.
496 *
497 * This function must not be used in interrupt context. Unlocking
498 * of a unlocked mutex is not allowed.
499 */
500 void __sched ww_mutex_unlock(struct ww_mutex *lock)
501 {
502 /*
503 * The unlocking fastpath is the 0->1 transition from 'locked'
504 * into 'unlocked' state:
505 */
506 if (lock->ctx) {
507 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
508 DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lock->ctx->acquired);
509 #endif
510 if (lock->ctx->acquired > 0)
511 lock->ctx->acquired--;
512 lock->ctx = NULL;
513 }
514
515 #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
516 /*
517 * When debugging is enabled we must not clear the owner before time,
518 * the slow path will always be taken, and that clears the owner field
519 * after verifying that it was indeed current.
520 */
521 mutex_clear_owner(&lock->base);
522 #endif
523 __mutex_fastpath_unlock(&lock->base.count, __mutex_unlock_slowpath);
524 }
525 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ww_mutex_unlock);
526
527 static inline int __sched
528 __ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
529 {
530 struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
531 struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx = READ_ONCE(ww->ctx);
532
533 if (!hold_ctx)
534 return 0;
535
536 if (ctx->stamp - hold_ctx->stamp <= LONG_MAX &&
537 (ctx->stamp != hold_ctx->stamp || ctx > hold_ctx)) {
538 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
539 DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ctx->contending_lock);
540 ctx->contending_lock = ww;
541 #endif
542 return -EDEADLK;
543 }
544
545 return 0;
546 }
547
548 /*
549 * Lock a mutex (possibly interruptible), slowpath:
550 */
551 static __always_inline int __sched
552 __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
553 struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip,
554 struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, const bool use_ww_ctx)
555 {
556 struct task_struct *task = current;
557 struct mutex_waiter waiter;
558 unsigned long flags;
559 int ret;
560 int wakeups = 0;
561
562 if (use_ww_ctx) {
563 struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
564 if (unlikely(ww_ctx == READ_ONCE(ww->ctx)))
565 return -EALREADY;
566 }
567
568 preempt_disable();
569 mutex_acquire_nest(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, nest_lock, ip);
570
571 if (mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx)) {
572 /* got the lock, yay! */
573 preempt_enable();
574 return 0;
575 }
576
577 spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
578
579 /*
580 * Once more, try to acquire the lock. Only try-lock the mutex if
581 * it is unlocked to reduce unnecessary xchg() operations.
582 */
583 if (!need_yield_to_waiter(lock) && !mutex_is_locked(lock) &&
584 (atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, 0) == 1))
585 goto skip_wait;
586
587 debug_mutex_lock_common(lock, &waiter);
588 debug_mutex_add_waiter(lock, &waiter, task);
589
590 /* add waiting tasks to the end of the waitqueue (FIFO): */
591 list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &lock->wait_list);
592 waiter.task = task;
593
594 lock_contended(&lock->dep_map, ip);
595
596 for (;;) {
597 /*
598 * Lets try to take the lock again - this is needed even if
599 * we get here for the first time (shortly after failing to
600 * acquire the lock), to make sure that we get a wakeup once
601 * it's unlocked. Later on, if we sleep, this is the
602 * operation that gives us the lock. We xchg it to -1, so
603 * that when we release the lock, we properly wake up the
604 * other waiters. We only attempt the xchg if the count is
605 * non-negative in order to avoid unnecessary xchg operations:
606 */
> 607 if ((!need_yield_to_waiter(lock) || wakeups > 1) &&
608 atomic_read(&lock->count) >= 0 &&
609 (atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, -1) == 1))
610 if (wakeups > 1)
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/octet-stream" (25495 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists