linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] Add support for SCT Write Same

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGnHSE=u1fPLVt4h_VxnCqHTx_YgyQhPGoiXgkoVd1jhrAogiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:46:31 +0800
From:	Tom Yan <tom.ty89@...il.com>
To:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:	Shaun Tancheff <shaun.tancheff@...gate.com>,
	Shaun Tancheff <shaun@...cheff.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Josh Bingaman <josh.bingaman@...gate.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] Add support for SCT Write Same

On 11 August 2016 at 09:47, Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Tom> so we can at most allow only a 2-block (well, or 3-block) payload.
>
> We tried turning on multi block payloads and it was a massive disaster.
> Many drives reported that they supported 8 block payloads but actually
> didn't. Instead of playing the blacklist game we capped it at a single
> sector.

I don't know, apparently Windows does multi block payloads though (at
least that's how it advertise on the simulated VPD).

What I meant was it will not make a big difference in our case anyway.
Given the 32-bit representation limitation, we could be at best using
a full 2-block payload. So let's not do 2 but 1? Fine :P

>
> Many drives from different vendors were affected by this. So we'd have
> to make multi block payloads an explicit opt-in like we did for
> discard_zeroes_data. However, given that "big" discards are mainly done
> synchronously when creating filesystems, I am not sure there is any real
> benefit to this.
>

Probably. Perhaps it could make a difference upon deletion of some
really big files (though the logical sectors used may not be
continuous anyway).

> --
> Martin K. Petersen      Oracle Linux Engineering