[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vaz8t62z.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:03:32 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: move hmi.c to arch/powerpc/kvm/
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com> writes:
> 2016-08-03 13:36+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
>> hmi.c functions are unused unless sibling_subcore_state is nonzero, and
>> that in turn happens only if KVM is in use. So move the code to
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/, putting it under CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HANDLER
>> rather than CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64. The sibling_subcore_state is also
>> included in struct paca_struct only if KVM is supported by the kernel.
>>
>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>> Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
>> Cc: kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> It would be nice to have this in 4.8, to minimize any 4.9 conflicts.
>> Build-tested only, with and without KVM enabled.
>
> If you agree with the change, would you prefer to have this patch merged
> through the PowerPC tree?
Yeah I'll pull it into my fixes branch.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists