[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160811202544.GA20512@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 22:25:44 +0200
From: rcochran@...utronix.de
To: Jouni Malinen <jkmalinen@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
rt@...utronix.de, Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PREEMPT-RT] [patch 4 14/22] timer: Switch to a non cascading
wheel
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 06:21:26PM +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> The test code looked like this in python:
>
> addr = (url.hostname, url.port)
> socks = {}
> for i in range(20):
> socks[i] = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM,
> socket.IPPROTO_TCP)
> socks[i].connect(addr)
You getting a timeout on TCP connect()? Isn't that timeout really
long, like 75 seconds or something?
> I can reproduce this easily, so if someone wants to get more details
> of the issue, just let me know how to collect whatever would be
> useful.
Can you provide a simple test case or explain in more detail how you
run your test? I would like to reproduce the issue it here.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists