[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160811202539.GG2695@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:25:39 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@...fitbricks.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] percpu-refcount: init ->confirm_switch member
properly
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:27:09PM +0200, Roman Pen wrote:
> This patch targets two things which are related to ->confirm_switch:
>
> 1. Init ->confirm_switch pointer with NULL on percpu_ref_init() or
> kernel frightfully complains with WARN_ON_ONCE(ref->confirm_switch)
> at __percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic if memory chunk was not properly
> zeroed.
>
> 2. Warn if RCU callback is still in progress on percpu_ref_exit().
> The race still exists, because percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu()
> drops ->confirm_switch to NULL early, but that is only a warning
> and still the caller is responsible that ref is no longer in
> active use. Hopefully that can help to catch incorrect usage
> of percpu-refcount.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@...fitbricks.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Applied to percpu/for-4.9.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists