[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160811211333.GL8132@piout.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 23:13:33 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: danielromell@...il.com
Cc: rtc-linux <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, daro@....se, jao@....se, mago@....se
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rtc: bq32k: Use correct mask name
for 'minutes' register.
On 11/08/2016 at 07:56:03 -0700, danielromell@...il.com wrote :
>
>
> Den torsdag 11 augusti 2016 kl. 15:42:58 UTC+2 skrev alexandre.belloni:
> >
> > On 11/08/2016 at 13:31:43 +0200, Daniel Romell wrote :
> > > From: Jan Östlund <j...@....se <javascript:>>
> > >
> > > The BQ32K_SECONDS_MASK and BQ32K_MINUTES_MASK both has the same
> > > value. This is no functional change.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Romell <da...@....se <javascript:>>
> >
> > Sorry, I saw it only before trying apply but both patches also need Jan's
> > SoB.
> >
>
> Ah, sorry, my bad. I'll ask him to add that.
> Is it ok if he just reply to the emails with his SoB line, or do you need a
> new patch set?
>
That's a bit unconventional but I'm fine with a simple mail.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists