lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJbDB6=sB1igRSAbqrw_v+05WhHFxXMJ9Ff8Pbu0qy2iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:36:21 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 50/51] x86/mm: move arch_within_stack_frames() to usercopy.c

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> When I tried to port arch_within_stack_frames() to use the new unwinder,
> I got a nightmare include file "header soup" scenario when unwind.h was
> included from thread_info.h.  And anyway, I think thread_info.h isn't
> really an appropriate place for this function.  So move it to usercopy.c
> instead.
>
> Since it relies on its parent's stack pointer, and the function is no
> longer inlined, the arguments to the __builtin_frame_address() calls
> have been incremented.

Cool, looks good (minor change noted below). This patch might be a
good place to drop this from mm/Makefile too:

# Since __builtin_frame_address does work as used, disable the warning.
CFLAGS_usercopy.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, frame-address)

Since frame-address warnings have been disabled globally now since
commit 124a3d88fa20 ("Disable "frame-address" warning").

> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 46 ++++++++------------------------------
>  arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c            | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 8b7c8d8e..fd849e6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -176,49 +176,21 @@ static inline unsigned long current_stack_pointer(void)
>         return sp;
>  }
>
> -/*
> - * Walks up the stack frames to make sure that the specified object is
> - * entirely contained by a single stack frame.
> - *
> - * Returns:
> - *              1 if within a frame
> - *             -1 if placed across a frame boundary (or outside stack)
> - *              0 unable to determine (no frame pointers, etc)
> - */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY

This ifdef shouldn't be needed: the arch_within_stack_frames wasn't
designed to depend on it.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> +int arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
> +                            const void * const stackend,
> +                            const void *obj, unsigned long len);
> +#else
>  static inline int arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
>                                            const void * const stackend,
>                                            const void *obj, unsigned long len)
>  {
> -#if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)
> -       const void *frame = NULL;
> -       const void *oldframe;
> -
> -       oldframe = __builtin_frame_address(1);
> -       if (oldframe)
> -               frame = __builtin_frame_address(2);
> -       /*
> -        * low ----------------------------------------------> high
> -        * [saved bp][saved ip][args][local vars][saved bp][saved ip]
> -        *                     ^----------------^
> -        *               allow copies only within here
> -        */
> -       while (stack <= frame && frame < stackend) {
> -               /*
> -                * If obj + len extends past the last frame, this
> -                * check won't pass and the next frame will be 0,
> -                * causing us to bail out and correctly report
> -                * the copy as invalid.
> -                */
> -               if (obj + len <= frame)
> -                       return obj >= oldframe + 2 * sizeof(void *) ? 1 : -1;
> -               oldframe = frame;
> -               frame = *(const void * const *)frame;
> -       }
> -       return -1;
> -#else
>         return 0;
> -#endif
>  }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY */
> +
>
>  #else /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c
> index b490878..96ce151 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>
>  #include <asm/word-at-a-time.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <asm/unwind.h>
>
>  /*
>   * We rely on the nested NMI work to allow atomic faults from the NMI path; the
> @@ -34,3 +35,45 @@ copy_from_user_nmi(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
>         return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(copy_from_user_nmi);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY

Same thing: no need to check CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY here: it should
be checking CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER instead.

> +/*
> + * Walks up the stack frames to make sure that the specified object is
> + * entirely contained by a single stack frame.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + *              1 if within a frame
> + *             -1 if placed across a frame boundary (or outside stack)
> + *              0 unable to determine (no frame pointers, etc)
> + */
> +int arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
> +                            const void * const stackend,
> +                            const void *obj, unsigned long len)
> +{
> +       const void *frame = NULL;
> +       const void *oldframe;
> +
> +       oldframe = __builtin_frame_address(2);
> +       if (oldframe)
> +               frame = __builtin_frame_address(3);
> +       /*
> +        * low ----------------------------------------------> high
> +        * [saved bp][saved ip][args][local vars][saved bp][saved ip]
> +        *                     ^----------------^
> +        *               allow copies only within here
> +        */
> +       while (stack <= frame && frame < stackend) {
> +               /*
> +                * If obj + len extends past the last frame, this
> +                * check won't pass and the next frame will be 0,
> +                * causing us to bail out and correctly report
> +                * the copy as invalid.
> +                */
> +               if (obj + len <= frame)
> +                       return obj >= oldframe + 2 * sizeof(void *) ? 1 : -1;
> +               oldframe = frame;
> +               frame = *(const void * const *)frame;
> +       }
> +       return -1;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY */
> --
> 2.7.4
>

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ