linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 09/51] x86/dumpstack: fix x86_32 kernel_stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMzpN2itJ4nOHm__XNv0uJ7OnKD0Cwf_sKSghfGgdf+_z7bTPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 14 Aug 2016 08:55:00 -0400
From:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/51] x86/dumpstack: fix x86_32 kernel_stack_pointer()
 previous stack access

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>> On x86_32, when an interrupt happens from kernel space, SS and SP aren't
>> pushed and the existing stack is used.  So pt_regs is effectively two
>> words shorter, and the previous stack pointer is normally the memory
>> after the shortened pt_regs, aka '&regs->sp'.
>>
>> But in the rare case where the interrupt hits right after the stack
>> pointer has been changed to point to an empty stack, like for example
>> when call_on_stack() is used, the address immediately after the
>> shortened pt_regs is no longer on the stack.  In that case, instead of
>> '&regs->sp', the previous stack pointer should be retrieved from the
>> beginning of the current stack page.
>>
>> kernel_stack_pointer() wants to do that, but it forgets to dereference
>> the pointer.  So instead of returning a pointer to the previous stack,
>> it returns a pointer to the beginning of the current stack.
>>
>> Fixes: 0788aa6a23cb ("x86: Prepare removal of previous_esp from i386 thread_info structure")
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
>
> This seems like a valid fix, but I'm not sure I agree with the intent
> of the code.  &regs->sp really is the previous stack pointer in the
> sense that the stack pointer was &regs->sp when the entry happened.
> From an unwinder's perspective, how is:
>
> movl [whatever], $esp
> <-- interrupt
>
> any different from:
>
> movl [whatever], $esp
> pushl [something]
> <-- interrupt
>
> Also, does x86_32 do this type of stack switching at all?  AFAICS
> 32-bit kernels don't use IRQ stacks in the first place.  Do they?  Am
> I just missing the code that does it?

32-bit uses a software-based stack switch to run on the IRQ stack.
See execute_on_irq_stack() in irq_32.c.

--
Brian Gerst