linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH stable-4.4 0/3] backport memcg id patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160814160824.GA5078@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:08:24 +0200
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:	Stable tree <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable-4.4 0/3] backport memcg id patches

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:56:16AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> this is my attempt to backport Johannes' 73f576c04b94 ("mm: memcontrol:
> fix cgroup creation failure after many small jobs") to 4.4 based stable
> kernel. The backport is not straightforward and there are 2 follow up
> fixes on top of this commit. I would like to integrate these to our SLES
> based kernel and believe other users might benefit from the backport as
> well. All 3 patches are in the Linus tree already.
> 
> I would really appreciate if Johannes could double check after me before
> this gets into the stable tree but my testing didn't reveal anything
> unexpected.

Thanks for these, at first glance they look good to me.

Johannes?

greg k-h