[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160814170905.485fbb24@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 17:09:05 +0100
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@...il.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jamespharvey20@...il.com, regressions@...mhuis.info,
hdegoede@...hat.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, oliver@...kum.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: Regression - SATA disks behind USB ones on v4.8-rc1, breaking
boot. [Re: Who reordered my disks (probably v4.8-rc1 problem)]
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 17:34:18 +0800
Tom Yan <tom.ty89@...il.com> wrote:
> Since when it is expected that SATA disks will always be probed before
> USB disks? We can't guarantee that even if we make sure all ata
> drivers are loaded before usb-storage/uas. That's why we need
> consistent namings (e.g. /dev/disk/by-id/*).
It hasn't. It isn't even true on older kernels and can depend on all
sorts of things. I have boxes that will put the USB first, and a 10
second google search says I'm not alone
http://serverfault.com/questions/322946/ensure-usb-disk-is-never-sda-even-when-booting-from-it
So your "regression" goes back to at least 2011.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists