[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9883272f-cffd-e550-f784-32977bace0c0@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:31:14 +0200
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/14] media: platform: pxa_camera: add buffer
sequencing
On 08/15/2016 03:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> writes:
>
>> Add sequence numbers to completed buffers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/pxa_camera.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/pxa_camera.c b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/pxa_camera.c
>> index d66443ac1f4d..8a65f126d091 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/pxa_camera.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/pxa_camera.c
>> @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ static void pxa_camera_start_capture(struct pxa_camera_dev *pcdev)
>> unsigned long cicr0;
>>
>> dev_dbg(pcdev_to_dev(pcdev), "%s\n", __func__);
>> + pcdev->buf_sequence = 0;
>
> I'm not so sure this is the right place to reset the buffer sequence.
>
> I've seen no documentation on the rules applicable to this sequence number:
> - should it be reset if a "start streaming" operation occurs ?
start_streaming is the recommended place for setting the counter to 0. It's what
v4l2-compliance expects.
It is not documented since 1) not every driver does this and 2) there may
be cases where this behavior is not desired.
That said, I have yet to see a driver where zeroing this in start_streaming
is not appropriate.
Regards,
Hans
> - should it be reset if a streams stops by lack of video buffers queued ?
> - should it be reset in queue_setup() like in other drivers ?
>
> Or should it _never_ be reset and only be a monotonic raising number ?
>
> Cheers.
>
> --
> Robert
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists