[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160815165238.6bwekwqdbdxjvfbk@treble>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:52:38 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 42/51] x86/unwind: create stack frames for saved
syscall registers
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 01:23:11AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> > The entry code doesn't encode pt_regs for syscalls. But they're always
> > at the same location, so we can add a manual check for them.
>
> At first I thought these would be useless (they're the *user* state
> and aren't directly relevant to the kernel), but then I realized that
> they could be extremely valuable: they contain the syscall args.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking. I'll add that justification to the
patch header.
> Do they display in OOPS dumps?
Yes.
> It might be nice to add orig_ax to the regs display too so we get the
> syscall nr as well.
Hm, good idea. I'm surprised orig_ax isn't already being shown since it
could be useful for exceptions and irqs too.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists