linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v5 3/3] net: phy: Add gmiitorgmii converter support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160816160959.GO14446@lunn.ch>
Date:	Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:09:59 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
Cc:	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
	Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
	Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaia@...inx.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 3/3] net: phy: Add gmiitorgmii converter support

> > https://github.com/lunn/linux/commit/03d375489ceb56e171056f44d0fe9c34ca
> > 5a098e
> > 
> > Notice the
> > 
> > Not-Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > 
> > and the Copyright i added?
> > 
> > In various emails i gave you the basic idea how this should be done, a framework
> > of code, and then took your code which did not even compile and made the core
> > of it work. This is as much my code as your code, so i expect my Copyright to be
> > kept on this code. And since this is my code, i need to give a Signed-off-by,
> > which i was not yet ready to give since the code was not complete or working.
> > 
> > Please put both my Copyright back and Not-Signed-Off-by back and post the
> > next version as RFC. Once i'm happy this code is O.K, i will give you a Signed-off-
> > by.
> 
> Sorry I should have been included your copyright.
> 
> I missed it...
> I didn't included your SOF because.
> AFAIK without explicit permission of the other person we shouldn't include SOF.
> That's why I didn't included your SOF and thanked for your efforts after SOF.
> Sorry if my understanding is wrong.

Without a SOB you cannot submit the patch for inclusion at all. You
should however reproduce tags which have been given, i.e. you should
of kept my Not-Signed-Off-by: making it clear i have not yet given
permission for this code to go into mainline.

	   Andrew