[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1471370496.4075.170.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:01:36 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Add missing newline terminators to kernel
messages
On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 19:50 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 15:40 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > >
> > > Before commit 874f9c7da9a4acbc ("printk: create pr_<level>
> > > functions"),
> > > pr_*() calls without a trailing newline characters would be
> > > printed with
> > > a newline character appended, both on the console and in the
> > > output of
> > > the dmesg command.
> > Hey Geert.
> >
> > This doesn't apply to -next as the pr_notice/pr_cont below is
> > properly changed to a single pr_notice.
> In which -next?
>
> Not in next-20160816, where the patch applies cleanly.
> Also not in arm/for-next.
My mistake, I was in the wrong directory.
It doesn't apply to Linus' tree.
Still, it'd be slightly nicer to use a single
pr_notice than the pr_notice/pr_cont.
cheers, Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists