[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVD9A5TBhBnnjBd81bFC-Wsn-pQn2gj6q0TAJ1xs52ERQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:06:35 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Add missing newline terminators to kernel messages
Hi Joe,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 19:50 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 15:40 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > > Before commit 874f9c7da9a4acbc ("printk: create pr_<level>
>> > > functions"),
>> > > pr_*() calls without a trailing newline characters would be
>> > > printed with
>> > > a newline character appended, both on the console and in the
>> > > output of
>> > > the dmesg command.
>> > Hey Geert.
>> >
>> > This doesn't apply to -next as the pr_notice/pr_cont below is
>> > properly changed to a single pr_notice.
>> In which -next?
>>
>> Not in next-20160816, where the patch applies cleanly.
>> Also not in arm/for-next.
>
> My mistake, I was in the wrong directory.
> It doesn't apply to Linus' tree.
It's meant for the arm tree.
> Still, it'd be slightly nicer to use a single
> pr_notice than the pr_notice/pr_cont.
Indeed. The code was recently changed to split the message, hence
my v2...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists