[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160816182855.2hdupen4dcmczxiw@vip.cybercity.dk>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 20:28:56 +0200
From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <ccc94453@....cybercity.dk>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] devicetree: Add vendor prefix for Shenzhen
Sunchip Technology Co., Ltd
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 07:56:24AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> > index 1992aa9..fbad2cea 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> > @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ ste ST-Ericsson
> > stericsson ST-Ericsson
> > syna Synaptics Inc.
> > synology Synology, Inc.
> > +sunchip Shenzhen Sunchip Technology Co., Ltd
> > SUNW Sun Microsystems, Inc
>
> These are not in alphabetical order. Maybe someone thought uppercase
> should be separate, but I don't. So please fix the ordering here moving
> SUNW before syna.
I'm new to this, so I could use a bit of guidance here. Is it OK if I
send a follow-up patch to fix the ordering or should I send a patch to
fix the ordering first, before the sunchip prefix is added?
I never considered the possibility that the list wouldn't be in
alphabetical order to begin with, so the brain power went into deciding
if uppercase should be sorted separately.
--
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for a year
Powered by blists - more mailing lists