linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: enable modules for sound on LCDK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <388d5e63-ff82-ca88-c60a-24ad87700afd@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:08:03 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Karl Beldan <kbeldan@...libre.com>
CC:	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
	Karl Beldan <karl.beldan+oss@...il.com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: enable modules for sound
 on LCDK

On Wednesday 17 August 2016 03:43 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:20:51PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Thursday 11 August 2016 01:38 AM, Karl Beldan wrote:
>>> This is the minimal set of additional modules required to support audio
>>> on the LCDK.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Karl Beldan <kbeldan@...libre.com>
>>
>> This patch does not apply because Kevin already added some missing audio
>> modules through commit "ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: enable DA850 audio
>> as modules"
>>
>> Can you please rebase on master branch of my tree[1] and resend?
>>
> 
> I checked out your tree.
> With Kevin's patch the needed modules get selected without needing 2/2.
> 
> However I don't know why he used:
>  CONFIG_SND_DA850_SOC_EVM=m
> instead of: 
>  CONFIG_SND_DAVINCI_SOC_MCASP=m
>  CONFIG_SND_SOC_TLV320AIC3X=m
> The former seems to me to be pre-DT style config. I used the latter in
> 2/2 and thought that's what we'd start switching to ? Unless it is for
> pre-DT compatibility ?

I don't think this is related to DT. As you said,
CONFIG_SND_DA850_SOC_EVM selects CONFIG_SND_DAVINCI_SOC_MCASP and
CONFIG_SND_SOC_TLV320AIC3X anyway.

To be honest, I am okay either way. Copying Peter to see if he has any
preference.

Thanks,
Sekhar